News

These are some interesting – and well-researched – that we may see in future. Some of the future areas to think about, for me, are the Long Island project (off East Coast Beach) and the movement of Paya Lebar Airbase.  The former is going to require some form of additional transport (the discussions suggest an LRT line), while for Paya Lebar airport, the new neighbourhood spans some 800 hectares; that’s bound to require an extension of some existing railway lines, and some new MRT stations. So far though, there hasn’t been a peep on new stations in the area; understandable as it’s far in the future, but I’d keep an eye out. I do wonder if accessibility will be an issue for these two new areas. That being said, the sheer number of new stations is going to be such that, in the next decade or two, I predict having an MRT station near your home will no longer be as big a deal. Rather, people will get picky about which are near your home, with some lines being considered more “premium” than others. Buyers will probably also focus on having train lines near their homes, so having just one MRT line nearby may not quite cut it anymore.  And don’t get me started about train lines to Changi Airport, or why there’s just one interchange at Tanah Merah. It’s high time we had multiple lines leading there since at the rate it’s growing, Changi Airport may as well declare itself its own country.  Now, for a current issue… I’m referring to the $300 per month rental vouchers, which you can read more about . These are meant to defray the cost of renting on the open market since HDB rental rates went berserk in the immediate aftermath of Covid. Those rates are , but tenants are reacting with the optimism of a chainsaw accident victim being told someone brought a bandaid. A flat $300 may not have been the best idea, as some people are in tougher situations than others. If you’re a low-income household, say $5,000 a month, then I doubt a $300 voucher helps when rental rates of 3-room flats in Woodlands average $2,400 per month (as of end-January 2024) I know that varying the voucher based on income will involve more paperwork; but it’s worth doing as it comes at a crucial and vulnerable point in people’s lives. The affected Singaporeans are at that precarious point of getting a first home, and are likely dealing with other factors such as the cost of marriage or a first child; this is a crucial turning point which justifies more help.  So whilst I think an across-the-board increase in rental vouchers may be a bit much, it might be reasonable to do it for families in lower income brackets.  As a matter of personal opinion, I feel Singaporeans have been conditioned to disregard tenant issues. This is a natural effect of living in a country with a near 90-percent homeownership rate: unlike the US or EU, where locals are also dependent on rentals, we’re used to thinking of rental as being a problem for mainly foreigners.  (And those foreigners are sometimes identified as affluent expatriates renting Orchard Road condos, who definitely don’t need help) But because of this sweeping assumption, we tend to ignore Singaporeans escaping dysfunctional families, lifelong singles, those caught in financial distress, or even lower-income foreign workers (who, let’s face it, keep everything from construction to F&B businesses ticking, and have for decades).  It may be time to reconsider rental policies, especially given the impact they can have in black swan events like Covid. Besides the occasional Singaporean who needs rentals, we do have to consider how many industries are dependent on lower-wage foreign workers; we should address the erroneous assumption that they need us more than we need them.  Some part of this is due to an observation of New York City over the past two weeks (I’ve been abroad to my favourite haunt again), where rental rates have seen of late. I probably don’t need to explain the social hardships involved here; Singaporeans are not any more immune to recent inflation, so you know how it feels. But one of the factors I noticed was diminishing business: fewer people eating out, fewer new shops opening, and a certain loss of “bustle” in the city; all factors that seem to boil down to high rent, and the associated costs of living it creates.  Again, I’m conscious our cities aren’t comparable, due to our abnormally high homeownership rates; but one shared factor is that high accommodation costs for foreign workers hurt businesses, and make certain lifestyles less affordable. Follow us on Stacked for more news on the Singapore property market.