Forum: More balanced approach needed to address PMD safety issues
I read with interest the article,
- by autobot
- Aug. 25, 2024
- Source article
Publisher object (23)
I read with interest the article, (Aug 20). The directive by Sembawang Town Council was for Admiralty Drive residents to remove their personal mobility devices (PMDs) and personal mobility aids (PMAs) from common areas and keep them within their homes. While I understand the intent behind this measure, I believe it is crucial to address the issue from a broader perspective to ensure the safety and convenience of all residents. The town council’s directive warns of PMDs and PMAs creating fire hazards in high-traffic common areas like void decks and corridors, where these devices can also obstruct movement and pose fire hazards. The recent highlights these risks. However, shifting the devices into private homes isn’t ideal. Singapore Civil Defence Force data shows a rise in mobility device fires in 2023. Fires in confined HDB units can spread quickly, endangering many residents. I believe a more balanced approach is needed. The Government and town councils should consider establishing secure, designated charging and storage areas for these devices. They could be located at void decks or other common spaces but designed with fire safety in mind – equipped with fire extinguishers and regulated charging stations, with proper ventilation. It is also essential to ensure that device owners are educated on safe charging practices and are held accountable for any damage caused by their devices. Encouraging the use of UL2272-certified devices and discouraging overnight charging are important steps. The safety of residents should always be the top priority. We need to explore comprehensive measures that protect both individual units and common areas, ensuring a safer environment for all.