News

The latest had a target: to slow the rising prices of HDB flats. To this end, the maximum Loan To Value (LTV) ratio for HDB loans has now decreased to 75 per cent, down from 80 per cent previously. But how much of a difference does five percentage points really make? And from the word on the ground, there were some suggestions that the middle class is being marginalised in more ways than one: with lower-income brackets getting more generous grants while the loans they can take will fall, essentially being the most affected. How true is all of this? The most common argument is that the lower-income groups get bigger subsidies, and the higher-income groups have no problems paying existing prices – but the sandwiched people in the middle, especially the *lower-*middle, feel they’re getting little to no help. But how dire is their situation?  Let’s look at a range of earnings up to $14,000 per month (if you earn more than that you can’t get an HDB loan anyway, so this would be irrelevant to you). The first thing to consider is the increased Enhanced Housing Grant (EHG) which has been ramped up to a maximum potential of $120,000 (up from $80,000). The amount of the EHG you get is based on income, among other factors: Note that for those who are in the earnings range of $8,000+ per month, the recent changes don’t provide any benefits to them.  Middle-class is admittedly a vague term; and it gets tougher when you want to define a lower and upper middle. But to be as fair as possible, let’s try to quantify it a bit: So who should we exclude from our study? As such, the middle class we’re looking at have a household income of around $6,708 to $13,399. Next, let’s look at how much each of these income groups can afford. Affordability varies greatly among different households as different people wish to take up different loan amounts or have varying levels of cash/CPF. So we’ll have to make a few assumptions: On 19th August, before the reduced LTV, this is what their situation looked like: Here’s a chart to paint a clearer picture: Here we looked at the maximum loan that can be taken based on the household income. Then we look at the remaining downpayment and how much can be helped with the CPF Housing Grant and Enhanced Housing Grant. Next, we added the Buyer Stamp Duty (BSD). The remaining downpayment that cannot be covered by grants and the BSD makes up the “ ” that each household has saved and is willing to commit to the purchase. This top-up is important because the to purchase an HDB of the same price. If they cannot do the top-up, then their affordability is drastically reduced. Here’s a look at how their situation changes on 20th August or later, when the LTV is reduced: As we’ve shown in “difference in top up”, some groups will need to raise the top up amount after the lower LTV. You can see that this is quite proportional, with the upper end of the spectrum having to top up more. Here’s what it looks like visualised: You can’t see the difference here as the flat price is the same, however, the top-up amount is now different. Due to the lower LTV, households across the board now have to cough up more cash/CPF to buy the same home. Here’s a side-by-side comparison of those earning a median income of $10,869: Before 20th August 2024, those earning the median household income had to to afford an HDB costing $859,506. Since the new LTV ruling, this is now , a difference of $42,975. For those who have $42,975 squirrelled away in fixed deposits or investments that can be readily liquidated to meet this new change, bravo! as you’ve merely reallocated your cash/investment into real estate. But not everyone is able to do so. If you are in urgent need of housing and have already saved up just enough to afford that dream home worth $800k+, this could spell a setback of a couple more months of saving to meet this requirement or buying something cheaper. How much lower would you have to go though? On the surface, you may think your affordability has dropped by just $42,975. . With the old LTV of 80%, each dollar you put up from your cash/CPF gets you 4x more leverage. Putting up $200K gets you $800K. This means you can buy a $1 million flat. But with the new LTV of 75%, each dollar you put up only gets you only 3x more leverage. This means the same $200K only gets you $600K in loans. Your max affordability is $800k now – a reduction of 20%. So what does the drop in affordability look like across our middle-income groups? In this case, we’ll use the cash/CPF available as a top-up plus the grants available to form the deposit. For simplicity, we’ve as some of it would still be needed to pay down the new HDB price anyway. Those earning the median income of $10,869 now see a drop of around $170k in affordability. This is a big difference. To see what this change means in reality, here’s a look at the average HDB flat prices in the past 6 months as well as what you could previously afford (in yellow): Considering this change, households with a median income now have to make some sacrifices. It could mean a much lower floor, an older HDB development or another estate. Either way, some kind of compromise has to be made. In this sense, those who want to chase after higher-priced resale flats (e.g., an $850,000 flat in Bishan or Toa Payoh) but had to scrimp for it are definitely going to feel the pain if they cannot meet the top-up requirements. Those who settle for BTO flats or cheaper resale flats likely won’t feel the sting, as you can see from the numbers above – a $500,000 to $600,000 flat is still attainable, even with a five per cent drop in LTV. The policy would apply mostly to those who have to squeeze a lot to purchase a highly-priced flat. The only question is – just how many Singaporeans would be affected by this? Judging from the past few regulatory changes, it seems like the answer is not so much given the steady increase in prices we’ve seen. For more on the situation as it unfolds, follow us on . If you’d like to get in touch for a more in-depth consultation, you can do so .